King Beast Barbaros →Used Deck

It is a remake monster of "Beast King Barbaros" recorded in the last regular pack of the 10th term, and it features a card name that is just replaced by one letter from the card name over there.
By releasing monsters in your field so that the total level is 8 or more, you can self-SS from your hand, and after entering the field, you can destroy the cards on your opponent's field with multiple removal effects and global attack effects. Exert proficiency.
Since this card itself can be used for "Barbaros", which is removed from the field or his GY as a cost to demonstrate multiple removal effects, it is impressive that it can be used together with "Skill Drain", which is compatible with the original Barbaros. .
It has heavier footwork than the original Barbaros, but it has a proper self-SS ability, and since it can peel off its back and has an all-out attack effect, its combat ability is also higher.
The original Barbaros is a level 8 monster that can be put into play without release, and since it is his Barbaros monster, it is also the best GY cost for releasing and removing effects for this card to self-SS.
Currently, there are very few types of Barbaros monsters, and it is difficult to say that it is an easy-to-handle card because of the lack of search methods, but the Barbaros monster group is more fulfilling than now, and especially when released or removed, the effect is triggered. A card that should shine even more if something like that comes out.

A "Barbaros" monster suddenly appeared. Barbaros appeared in the structure deck theme vote, but I thought that he lost the vote and was shelved, and only one body entered the regular pack. Since he can special summon by releasing monsters on his field so that the total level is 8 or more, it clearly says to compromise summon and release "Beast King Barbaros". Also, by excluding Beast King Barbaros from his GY, 2 cards on the opponent's field can be destroyed. Furthermore, it is possible to attack all opponent's monsters with 3000 RBI. However, the only other "Barbaros" monster exists is 《Beast Machine King Barbaros Ür》, and the search is scarce, so it's a little troublesome to arrange them. As expected, I don't think I can leave it as it is, so I think it will be strengthened a little more. Even so, which one is better, the God Beast King or the Beast God King?

A card full of the feeling of being put out of storage of a card that was put into storage as a result of the Strak vote.
If you devise it, you can get ATK 3000 with a single release.
If the release is his Barbaros, it will be directly connected to the removal effect.
However, even though it can remove 2 cards, monsters have an all-out attack, and there are many cases where you want to do it before destroying backs, so there are some aspects that don't mesh well.
I would like to use it in combination with the original Barbaros, but the problem is that there is so much support here and there, and moreover, there is a lack of search and recruitment methods.
One card that can be expected because it seems that usability will improve as the number of cards in the Barbaros category increases.

A card rumored to be the result of a Strak candidate.
An effect that allows you to Special Summon by releasing monsters on your field to level 8 or higher, an effect that allows you to destroy 2 cards on your opponent's field by excluding his Barbaros on the field or his GY, an overall attack have an effect.
Special Summon requires releasing monsters on the field to be level 8 or higher. Since he is a Barbaros, you can prevent the wear of Ads by using Compromised Summoned God Beast King or Special Summoned Beast God Machine King as material, which can lead to the second effect.
The removal effect with Barbaros as a cost can be used even if you banish yourself, so depending on the situation, you can banish yourself. This card itself can do a 3000 RBI all-out attack, so I want to choose a card that can efficiently destroy the opponent with battle and effects.
At present, there is not much significance in putting him together in Barbaros, but maybe in the future...? ?

Barbaros is categorized! Forget about other subordinate gods.
There are many cards in the highest level that are easy to deploy, so it should be easy to play with your own effect.
The effect of 2 is wide area removal, but needs Barbaros. I can make myself a cost, but I feel a little wasteful without thinking about it.
All Barbaros are level 8, so I'd like to rotate them by train.
Like Uru, it has an all-out attack, and unlike over there, it has no disadvantages and hit points are high, so its usefulness is uneven.
The effect itself is powerful, but Barbaros does not have a stable search at the moment, it has a wide range of removal effects and all-out attacks, Barbaros removal and Ur summoning conditions, and the synergy with Skidre, which is compatible with Barbaros, is not high. There is also a bad point, and the current situation is not so easy to handle.

I thought it was categorized as "Barbaros", but on the contrary, it wasn't in the "King of Gods" category...
① is an effect that makes the total monster level of the field 8 and allows you to special summon yourself. "Since it's not a Special Summon monster, Tribute Summon is also possible."
② is an effect that destroys 2 cards from "Barbaros" GY exclusion and targets it, but it's advantageous to destroy 2 cards.
③ is easy to gain an advantage in battle, inheriting the effect of the continuous attack effect "Machine Lord Ür".
② and ③ are not compatible with 《Skill Drain》, but ① can be played regardless.
That said, since there is a 《Beast King Barbaros》that can be played at no cost, I can't say it's a big advantage, but I'd like to make it a deck that effectively utilizes ② and ③.

Removal monsters that appear by releasing monsters of level 8 or higher
If the material is not his Barbaros, he can destroy 2 cards.
Its 3000 all-out attack is also powerful, and combined with its removal effect, you can aim to annihilate your opponent's monsters.
I think it's an interesting card, but it's a huge hindrance for both myself and the original Barbaros.